Following a week-long tour of Belize, Jamaica and the Bahamas, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge boarded RAF Voyager to return home to London.
The Duke and Duchess arriving at Lynden Pindling International Airport.
The national anthem being played.
The national anthem being played at the Lynden Pindling International Airport before the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge board their plane to leave New Providence which completes their Caribbean tour as part of the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. pic.twitter.com/BJvx8NlkQZ
— OURnews Bahamas (@OurNewsRev) March 27, 2022
The tour has seen a plethora of engagements, meetings with members of the public, thanking frontline healthcare workers, prioritising teachers, children, and a focus on the environment. We had three splendid black-tie events with jaw-dropping looks (and jewels). The couple enjoyed private time for diving, snorkeling and a date night with dinner and drinks at a breathtaking resort in Belize.
As we discussed from day one, the tour was not without its challenges which has raised questions regarding the planning and how tours will be conducted in the future. Reflecting on this, Prince William released a statement tonight addressing some of the topics of coverage over the past week: "I know that this tour has brought into even sharper focus questions about the past and the future. In Belize, Jamaica and The Bahamas, that future is for the people to decide upon. Foreign tours are an opportunity to reflect. You learn so much. What is on the minds of Prime Ministers. The hopes and ambitions of school children. The day-to-day challenges faced by families and communities. I know that this tour has brought into even sharper focus questions about the past and the future. In Belize, Jamaica and The Bahamas, that future is for the people to decide upon. But we have thoroughly enjoyed spending time with communities in all three countries, understanding more about the issues that matter most to them."
William continued: "Catherine and I are committed to service. For us that's not telling people what to do. It is about serving and supporting them in whatever way they think best, by using the platform we are lucky to have. It is why tours such as this reaffirm our desire to serve the people of the Commonwealth and to listen to communities around the world. Who the Commonwealth chooses to lead its family in the future isn't what is on my mind. What matters to us is the potential the Commonwealth family has to create a better future for the people who form it, and our commitment to serve, and support, as best we can."
'In a highly unusual move, Kensington Palace issued some words from the Duke of Cambridge as he and Kate flew back from The Bahamas – the last of the three countries they have visited this week on a tour which has raised questions about their relevance in 2022.
It’s been the first big tour since the pandemic and the Black Lives Matter protests after which many communities have been looking anew at the wrongs of the past and their impact on the present.
This visit to three Commonwealth Realms - former colonies which gained independence but kept The Queen as Sovereign – was to celebrate the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. Consequently, the programme often appeared to be looking back when it could have been looking forward.'
The Duchess delivered two speeches during the tour. I particularly enjoyed her words to schoolchildren in Nassau yesterday: "I always think it is the simple things in life that bring us the most joy: Playing together, chatting to your friends at school, eating meals together, and listening to each other's stories. These are the things that bring us together and give meaning to our lives. The connections, the relationships and the friendships that you make during school are so special. So please look after them, cherish them and take time for them. And remember to be kind, and understanding and loving to yourself and others". Kate concluded with a Bahamian proverb: "When the moon is not full the stars shine more brightly."
For Kate's final look of the tour, she paid tribute to the gold of the Bahamas flag in Alessandra Rich's Floral-Print Silk-Jacquard Peplum Midi dress (with thanks to Middleton Maven).
The 1980s-inspired piece is available at Net-A-Porter and FarFetch retailing for £1,690/$2,350.
More from the product description:
'Take a closer look at the fabric of Alessandra Rich's midi dress and you'll see how detailed it is - the silk-jacquard is finely woven with polka-dots and printed with delicate roses in tonal-yellow hues. It has an '80s-inspired silhouette with a bow-detailed ruffled collar, puffed sleeves and a pleated peplum at the waist. The crystal-embellished buckle and faux pearl buttons are a nod to the decade's glamorous excess.'
A closer look at the crystal-embellished belt.
Middleton Maven suggests the Duchess wore a pair of Gianvito Rossi 105 leather pumps.
It looks like Kate wore her Patrick Mavros Ocean Tides Milky Quartz earrings.
Tonight's departure follows a busy day of engagements in Abacos and Grand Bahamas. To catch up please click here.
Before I sign off for this tour, I want to say a sincere word of thanks to all of you who checked in, followed and commented during the tour. It's the community here which makes it fun and royal tours offer a unique opportunity to experience a varied range of updates and engagements. A special thanks to the photographers, particularly Stephen Lock for his work. My fellow Kate bloggers and the amazing ladies who identified Kate's pieces at break-neck speed -- they continue to astound me. What was your favourite look of the tour? I adored the ice blue Phillipa Lepley.
It's Mother's Day in the UK tomorrow, and I have no doubt the Cambridges are excited to spend it with these three :)
This may just be my favourite EVER look! Amazing
ReplyDeleteMe, too;I've been complaining about the wrong fabrics, etc. but I agree--so feminine, Caribbean-ee(?), fresh, wonderful style--I LOVE this outfit and yes, may just be my fav. ever.
DeleteNope. Not feeling this at all.
ReplyDeleteRight there with ya. This dress is a
DeleteHard no for me. Maybe because I wore too much of it in the 80’s and I never want to see it again ;)
Me neither. She really should drop these 80's looks.
DeleteWhy should she drop them if she likes them?
DeleteUmm...yeah, no. This look is horrifying, lol
ReplyDeleteI LOVE this Alessandra Rich youthful look that combines playful details with a mature silhouette. As others have noted, her hair has been somewhat problematic on this tour. However, her hair here, as well as while wearing the white McQueen pantsuit, the chic side chignon worn on her last day in Jamaica, etc. were highlights! Several outfits were home runs. Her best evening look was, in my opinion, the Jenny Packham green evening gown, mainly because her hair looked better than the other two events. Her best day looks were, in my opinion, the two Emilia Wickstead dresses, the Self-Portrait dress and this Alessandra Rich dress. Thanks so much Charlotte for your detailed posts!
ReplyDeleteWell, it has been a great tour. Fashionwise, it has been a treat with Kate mixing things up. My favorite look was definitely the pink gown with the sleek hair. She looked so gorgeous and chic. But this outfit is just a big NO. This is probably one of the worst looks of Kate ever for me. It looks so dated and matronly, giving you 80s vibe but not in a good way. Everything about the dress is just so wrong. I have not been a fan of Alessandra Rich's dresses on Kate. A big miss.
ReplyDeleteWow! So 80's! Brings back fond memories of an exact type dress I had only in a different color - same peplum style, same belt, and those white pumps! Looks like they had a great time, and can only imagine how excited they are to see their family. Thank you Charlotte for all your posts!
ReplyDeleteI agree..a fun 80's throwback! Kate pulled it off and it was for an airport good-bye where an outfit can get lost and she stood out full of sunshine on a dark departure night. I love yellow on her and her pony tail brought some youth to it. She stood out and I think in a good bright way!
DeleteI hate to say this, but this is by far my least favorite dress she’s ever worn. Way to fussy and that crystal buckle is just awful. I’m so surprised by this choice. It’s so “not her.”
ReplyDeleteFirst major miss of the tour for me. I even thought the white lace dress was a cute dress, just too churchy. But this gives me major 80s suits vibes. Its like something Diana would have worn. It also fits in an awkward way around Kate's neck, shoulders, and waist. Overly baggy and boxy.
ReplyDeleteOmg no this dress is awful! Wayyy Too much of every embellishment.
ReplyDeleteThis dress is exquisite! I love it!
ReplyDeleteI really like this dress. It's similar to a dress I wore in the late 80's. Pencil skit, peplum, buttons up the front, big puff sleeves. I've always wanted to re-design this dress of mine and Alessandra Rich does a good job. I might edit it and remove the the bow or the ruffle but the silk fabric is lovely.
ReplyDeleteGlad to see Kate using existing white heels and maybe the Ferragamo clutch? As well as a re-wear on the earrings. And of course loving the pony tail. I hope we'll see many of this new fashion choices on Kate in the near future. Wimbledon (Yellow Roksanda dress), Garden Parties (Jenny Packham Blue Lace Dress, love to see this with a hat), Polo Matches (Tory Burch and Mint Self Portrait dress), Royal Ascot (White Lace McQueen), etc. Hopefully the gowns will be re-worn publicly as well. There was only two 're-wears' on the tour (YSL Jacket and Packham Green Dress). We won't tire seeing previously worn clothing "re-styled".
How these two continued to smile throughout the royal tour was tried and true professionalism.
Kate and Wills, enjoy the time home with the kids but I hope there's time well spent with HM, PC and the firm on a debrief and "next steps."
Does anyone else see the resemblance to the top of Princess Diana's wedding gown? This is truly an 80's vibe. The color and print are lovely. Thank you for such wonderful and informative coverage throughout the tour.
ReplyDeleteI hadn't thought about that, but that was very early 80s, and I don't associate it with 80s fashion in general. I wasn't seeing bows and puffed sleeves very often. On the contrary, 80s fashion was largely about strong suits and other professional wear, because so many young women had entered in the workplace in the 70s and early 80s. It was the yuppie era, remember. I was wearing a lot of blazers with big shoulder pads. This outfit, with its long skirt, nipped-in waist, and the puffed sleeves, actually looks somewhat 40s-ish and 50s-ish to me, a combination thereof.
DeleteI was in the work force in the 80's and this dress is definitely a portion of clothing styles that we saw and wore. I too had my blazers with strong shoulders and classic suits for business meetings, my particular go to brands were Ellen Tracey and Ann Taylor, but I also mixed it up with some Karen Alexander and Nicole Miller dresses that had exactly this silhouette with peplums in very feminine prints in cotton and silk. The buttons and belt buckle in this dress remind me of the costume jewelry which was popular then as well, which were a return of styles from the 40's and 50's and I wore them quite proudly in the 80's. Google Karen Alexander and Nicole Miller dresses from the 80's and you will see similar looks to this dress Kate is wearing. It's definitely is 80's vibes.
DeleteI'll take your word for it, but I don't recall seeing anything like this, whereas the dress really says 1940s to me. I do remember Nicole Miller though didn't wear her. A search isn't turning up any Miller dresses with puffed sleeves, bows at the collar, peplums, AND crystal belt buckles and pearl buttons. NM dresses were simpler than this Rich affair, and Rich has done a lot of 40s-inspired designs. I've been following her for a while though may stop if she continues to turn out designs like this!
DeleteJust to add to this conversation, it is interesting to note that Queen Letizia, just today, wore a red dress worn by Queen Sophia with 80's vibes. In fact it has the drop waist of the pink dress Kate wore on Saturday and the puffed sleeves of the yellow dress. Queen Letizia is usually touted as being very edgy in her choices and many wish Kate would follow her style, but it seems that repurposing a look already worn by a former royal, as well as the 80's vibe is on trend. There is something for everybody!
DeleteOmg the 80's are back!!
ReplyDeleteGood morning - what a lovely tour :)
ReplyDeleteI was wondering - does Kate have a new hairdresser? I have the feeling her hair is more „natural“ this time? And I also love that she is wearing a ponytail sometimes ;) do we know in what Resort then slept in Belize? :)
In Belize they stayed at the San Ignacio Resort Hotel. The Queen stayed there on her visit as well
DeleteOh,no. The worst look of all! Zofia
ReplyDeleteI am impressed by this Miu Miu-esque flirty, off-beat dress. If I were a betting gal, I would say that during this tour Kate felt at her most glamorous in the two Alexander McQueen outfits and the frothy Packham frock worn in Jamaica.
ReplyDeleteThat's a great way to describe it Nancy, it's a flirty off-beat dress. I actually love the material and think that Kate gave us a huge mix-up of fashion this trip and certainly lots to talk about!! I'd agree with you on the most glamourous looks, and would include the last evening look as well.
DeleteThanks for your work
ReplyDeleteWell, if the 80s styles are coming back, and it certainly appears that way... then no one is going to wear them better than this gorgeous woman. It's fun and feminine and a complete departure from the "boho" style that we've been seeing for years now, so why not?
ReplyDeleteThis might be the worst thing I have ever seen her wear. I absolutely loved almost everything that she wore during the tour but this is awful.
ReplyDeleteI just do not understand this dress at all. I really don't like it. There were a few things I didn't understand on this trip. Mostly, the hair. But, this dress is the worst IMO.
ReplyDeleteExactly, my thought, Dear Unknown! That dress and the hair.
DeleteGorgeous outfit, love her sleek hair.
ReplyDeleteOof. That dress and the white pumps can stay in the 80s!
ReplyDeleteThis is such a fun look! I love that she’s taking risks!!
ReplyDeleteWow, this last departure dress looks spectacular, indeed vibes from the 80's. Though i personally would and can never wear such a dress, I do appreciate how good it looks on the Duchess's figure.
ReplyDeleteHairstyles on tour in general: read another comment that it was "disastrous". I thought it was better described as approchable. Looks simple, more in line with the relaxed sfeer of the Caribbeans.
A tour well done on the fashion side and also on communicating their attitudes on the relevance of the RF.
Wow. As someone who could find merit even in the controversial Erdem, all I ask is why or how was this chosen? So many beautiful gold/yellow dresses and she chooses this one? I’m also disappointed not a single local designer or artisan was chosen for any Kate’s outfits. I think the tour peaked with the green ruffle evening dress and nosedived after that. The ice blue dress was a refreshing hit but everything else was not as strong as the beginning of the tour (the white pant suit was such a surprise!)
ReplyDeleteI think the biggest surprise for us all was that this was probably the Cambridge’s first challenging tour. I know criticism wasn’t pleasant but I hope their team continues to challenge themselves by having them go on this type of important diplomatic tours (as effortless as they make it look, this are not paid vacations but work). I also hope their team learns from their missteps. As much as I love the Cambridges, even I agree they misread the room playing colonial dress up on the Land Rover. They had some great hits as well, and I hope they celebrate that in the weeks to come!
You are blaming the Cambridges for something which would have been decided at the local level. Royal visitors don't decide details like this. I agree it looks like an unfortunate throwback to past Royal Tours, but the local organisers obviously decided to use the Land Rover which they had kept from a previous visit.
DeleteWow, this last departure dress looks spectacular, indeed vibes from the 80's. Though i personally would and can never wear such a dress, I do appreciate how good it looks on the Duchess's figure.
ReplyDeleteHairstyles on tour in general: read another comment that it was "disastrous". I thought it was better described as approchable. Looks simple, more in line with the relaxed sfeer of the Caribbeans.
A tour well done on the fashion side and also on communicating their attitudes on the relevance of the RF.
~Dutch Michelle
Thank you Charlotte, as always you did a great job! I've loved this tour so much. My favourite lokk was the yellow one, I think the Duchess looks fantastic
ReplyDeleteNope not feeling it at all. The tour had to be fulfilled in that regard The Cambridge did their bit very well. The news of the Caribbean countries going their own way seemed awkward in the wake of this visit. Nonetheless, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge gave their hosts respect, and kindness and an open door should things change.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your hard work, Catherine
ReplyDelete[Before I continue, I would like to ask about your Mad About Meghan blog. Will you only post about appearances and not announcements like her podcasts? Hope it doesn't feel like I'm add to the pressure.]
This tour has been incredibly difficult and as someone who is interested in the royal family, but unsure about Kate's public personal (I dislikes William's) this tour was 50/50 for me.
On the one hand I respect that she showed up despite the how difficult it is. It takes courage to perform your duties in these conditions.
On the other hand, she and her team really messed up with this tour. I like Kate's speeches, I am liking that we are hearing more from her.
Her clothes however, beautiful, missed the marked. Not only do I feel Iike Kate, 40 years old, still same to copy a lot of royal women, e.g. Diana, QE, Meghan. But in this timeframe, when there are calls to remove QE it was bad. I like that her jewelry, though beautiful, were more understated, but I still wonder if it was in good taste? Then there was Kate wearing in Jamaica. White and orange is the opposition party's colors. Did she not know that? And why would she wear that if it, if she knew. Her clothes also referred back to a time these countries are, possibly, for the first time healing from. It felt like rubbing salt in the wound.
Then, Lisa's article, why didn't she respond? Even if it is something like: "I enjoyed my meeting with Lisa and was saddened to hear about the harassment she faced." I know a lot of people it's not Kate's job, but it seems to be a pattern with her. There is a big elephant (well 2 now) in the room with her interactions with other women, especially with women of color. And where she is portrayed as the victim. The RF wants to hold on to the Commonwealth, so Kate needs look like she at least can address the issues women face. Especially, when WOC are involved, because they are often critised for existing.
I am not so sure that its the RF who wants to hold onto the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth is an association of countries across the world and while historically they were connected to the British Empire, any country can apply to be a member of the Commonwealth, and participation is by free association. There is more to being a part of the Commonwealth that goes beyond Britain and the Queen, who, I repeat is merely a ceremonial leader, the countries are governed by their elected officials and government. Being a part of the commonwealth is also being a part of a mutually supportive community of independent and sovereign states, aided by more than 80 Commonwealth organisations. The Commonwealth Secretariat was established in 1965, to help support Commonwealth member countries to achieve development, democracy and peace. There is a huge misconception, that the British Empire IS the commonwealth. While it may have started out that way, it is has been evolving into an organization that supports the will of the people with movement back to 1965. The Queen clearly supported Barbados.
DeleteAs to Kate, I think her mission and goal is to use their platform to support programs that enrich the lives of all people that would aid in a better foundation and life for children and family, I see no action on Kate's part to exclude WOC in any of her initiatives, neither in the past or during this tour. It is unfortunate that the focus on that aspect of the tour is swept under the rug and that the politics of the day have been whittled down to politicising the clothes she has worn. That is not to say that the politics aren't critically important, because they definitely are, but its just to say that perhaps the objective of this tour should have been laid out clearly in the beginning rather at the end, and perhaps we are all reading too much into the clothes. I feel that both Kate and William have come away from this very aware of the challenges we all face in the future. The lesson has not been lost.
The photos through the fence and with Bob Marley statue. What were they thinking? Especially with William's recent "Africa overcrowded and war is alien" comments. Even if the fence were their, they should've released other photos. It was to much a reminder of the past. The awkward Bob Marley photo shouldn't have happened, because of his advocacy. I feel like their were other ways to celebrate him.
ReplyDeleteI recently read a question on Twitter (a platform I promptly left because of the hate): "why is Kate always compared to other women and shown is lacking?"
The poster went on to post about Kate's small children and why she is approaching things her way.
If this were a normal job/role, I would absolutely want Kate should approach it her way. But it is not.
She may only be the spouse of the second in line, but Kate has enormous power, and she can make a great difference.
She is often in the media portrayed as a modern princess, but her public image is not. This tour underscored it. Reporting on her visits only focuses her clothes, with the exception of this blog. But even here, Charlotte tends to add the meat.
Do I believe Kate is fully responsible? No, the RF and BM doesn't seem to understand how to showcase modern royalty. But I do believe she has a hand in it. Kensington can and should release something before or after a visit. A how can you help? Kate can auction of some of her clothes or gifts she can receive? They can use words other than "keen". Not only does Kate represent the British women, who I'm hoping is more modern than this?, but she, or at least the goal of the RF, is for her to be relevant in the Commonwealth. She needs to step up.
I have also read a lot of pity for the couple, I understand that. I am very frustrated that their is more focus on what they are going through, instead of what these citizens are feeling. Or even annoyance, that they are expressing what they are feeling.
As someone from a former conalized and current Commonwealth country, I want to say: the pandemic exposed a lot of inequalities that showed the foundation was broken. But it also give, probably for the first time, the people the time to take stock of the past and their lost. For you, it may seem like a lifetime ago, for many the ripples can still be felt. We are grieving and that comes with a lot of stages. That includes, rage. If William was really sincere in his final message, he, Kate, his team, the media and everyone who has benefitted from/support them, will have to have the emphaty to face these reactions. Despite your discomfort, because that is to me, what service truly means.
While the media has often peddled the whole modern princess narrative, it is important to keep in mind that Kate has never painted herself like that. The exact opposite. The image she portray and the role she has carved is that of consistency and stability. Not of revolutionizing the world (or the monarchy) but making small changes over time. We can differ over whether it is a good or a bad thing in her role, but whether we like it or not Kate is no revolutionary. And she never claimed to be.
DeleteRight but she may not have a choice. I realize the royal family motto is keep calm and carry on and consistency and never deviating but if the result of that philosophy is tone deaf imagery from 50 years ago in the era of Black Lives Matter and increased criticism of wealth, economic, and health inequality then they’re going to have to change. That’s all there is to it. I don’t think she (or they) need to be revolutionary but they do need to be innovative and understand tone and context. And simply relying on the way it’s always been done isn’t the winning strategy. There are several existing approaches to a tour like this they could have followed. Visiting with actual business leaders and on the ground healthcare workers and educators (and not in the photo op way where many lower level healthcare workers have come forward and indicated they were prohibited from interaction with W and K). Heard from womens rights activists, visited actual memorials/museums to slavery. Less photo ops featuring new and expensive flashy outfits. Other European royal families are taking more of this approach so the model absolutely exists. Cultural events are fine but this tour really had an air of the “natives entertaining the white overseers” and that’s entirely avoidable in 2022 and frankly there isn’t much of an excuse to not have handled this better. It’s pretty clear to me William and Kate just want to follow the pattern that’s always been there. Whether that’s insecurity or blind spots on the issues or genuine belief in the divine right of royals I don’t know. But there does need to be a reckoning about the intention of these types of tours and events going forward. I don’t think that’s demanding revolution it’s simply acknowledging the way things have always been done is increasingly inappropriate.
DeleteI would completely agree RachelZA. She has always purported herself to "making small changes over time". Whether or not that is what we want her role to be, there is something to be said for those in supporting roles, sometimes they can effect the most change over time.
DeleteAt the beginning of the tour I was roasted here for saying that the tour gave off rich white people gawking at the natives and saying 'oh how dear.' And at the end of the tour that's exactly what most of the media and this website is saying.
DeleteThank you, RachelZA and Anynomous
DeleteI agree RachelZA, but as clearly seen there is a relationship with the press. So, I believe Kate can ask for another portrayal. I do think she stated that she wants small changes over time, but her work seems to lack any follow through.
I remember how Meghan’s work was often criticized or left of the RF rooster. I say this not to start a Meghan/Kate war, but to show that there was a modern approach, and it was heavily criticized. And what Meghan has done isn’t by any means revolutionary, many British work this way, many royal families work this way.
So, the RF seem to prefer this method for being seen, but not much else. Then they have to face the consequences. Stating that it is traditions is very ignorant, since the current social era shows that past traditions do not work. Those traditions were also built on the backs of the oppressed, so it may not be something they’d want to promote.
As to Kate not wanting to be revolutionary, she won’t be. If she steps up, she will just reflect the women who she must represent. She may not want to, but it is her duty. Wasn’t that what she signed up for when she married William?
By all means go for a modern approach, but some of the things you are suggesting are viewed as political interference and therefore to be carefully avoided by non elected Heads of State and their families. The current Prince of Wales was widely felt to be getting into dangerous territory with some of his personal advocacy. (The so-called "black spider" letters.) There are occasions when important issues arise and there are different opinions amongst the electorate. In a constitutional monarchy it is the elected leaders and other citizens who debate the issues. The Head of State is expected to remain neutral and leave controversial issues for others to decide, because if they speak up it is regarded as taking sides. It has been a hard lesson for Royals to learn but British history shows that the general public eventually rebels against monarchs who try to enforce their own opinions. ( Magna Carta, the Glorious Revolution etc.) An elected Head of State is able to be voted out and is in theory subject to the will of the electorate but this does not always work in practice.
DeleteThank you, Charlotte. I'm sorry this one ran away from me a little bit. The two were supposed to be one post, but it was to long.
ReplyDeleteI had to copy it to my notes and cut it
Oh dear, that yellow dress looks like it’s been raided from Fergie’s 80s wardrobe!
ReplyDeleteThank you Charlotte for your great articles on the royal tour. You have always been very responsive and updated the blog quickly. Hope you can rest now :-)
ReplyDeleteIt's the end of a very special tour for the Cambridges, but Kate and William have understood the challenges and William has made a magnificent declaration.
This royal tour gave us more beautiful outfits than each other but my favorite is the green evening dress JP.
Thank you Charlotte for your detailed posts! To me, it has been an amazing tour. William just nailed it with his last closing speech. I think they did a great job. We can see so much strength -& love- in them and for what/who they serve. As for my choice for the Duchess' outfits: nr.1, the J. Peckham emerald green gown, nr.2 the Roksanda yellow dress, nr.3 the pink/magenta glittering gown with capped sleeves. For my favourite destination, I'd vote Belize!
ReplyDeleteWell done to all staff for organising a great tour. Happy Mother's day!
Charlotte, let me thank YOU for the coverage of this tour. If I can say that, I'm proud of you did it for an entire week (and more, given the background work), with all the details, sartorially or not.
ReplyDeleteYour blog has been my favourite one for years, keep on doing this for a long time!
Nooooooooooooooo!!!!! What an ugly outfit! Really?! Looks like the green one she wore when in Ireland. The 80's style is definitely a big NO for me!
ReplyDeleteOh dear. Maybe if it was 1983. Rare miss for this trip. Cannot imagine what inspired Kate to pick this one but never mind. Her other outfits have been generally pretty nice.
ReplyDeleteI think it’s wise that William has made this statement- he’s said to have had doubts about doing this tour in the first place and maybe - with hindsight - the comments he’s made on leaving would have set the tone before or at beginning. It’s brilliant to see though that they recognise that there has been a shift in thinking and are talking about it, facing up to the issues. Part of me hopes this is William growing in statue and taking the lead and not just doing as others have done before him. I think it’s been a defining moment for both. That last day was absolutely spot on what W&C are brilliant at doing - we saw their warmth and interaction with the people.
ReplyDeleteCatherine’s choice in clothes has been mostly a great show and loved her straight sleek looks. We all like to see formal occasions and it’s part of the diplomacy - but maybe a steer towards the more informal and educational suits them better. I think they coped with all the negative PR in a defining way too - gone are the days of never explain, never complain. Lessons to learn all round.
Thanks for all your coverage as ever Charlotte xx
Very well said Anon! Relationships do evolve, and William has shown and stated that he gets the lesson and has already, by virtue of his statement, has learned from it. Good on him!
DeleteI agree. I note that Prince William was very careful not to say he supports one side or the other in the debate, but simply to say they are listening carefully and will accept whatever decision is made. Similarly the Queen has largely kept out of the debate on Scotland leaving the UK although of course we suspect that she would prefer them to stay. The royal family must walk a tightrope in such matters and William and Kate have coped brilliantly in a tricky situation.
DeleteI love Kate and I think she hit it out of the park on this tour, but this is one ugly dress.
ReplyDeleteAs for the side shows around this tour. I think it was very patronizing for anybody, whether regular media or social media, to suggest that W&K’s tour would or should have any effect on whether these three countries retain the monarchy. As William said, it is for the people to decide and it is insulting for any one to suggest that such a big decision will be swayed by a glittering gown or even a royal gaffe.
Well said Rachel ZA! I think William's last statements were well stated and I am glad that he made that rare move. Also whoever coined the phrase 'charm offensive' did a huge discredit to the narrative of this tour. It is very offensive to think that they need only 'charm' to be effective, pure rubbish. It is very patronizing that both the regular and social media drive this negativity which takes away from the very creditable work being done by many in worthy iniatives. The speeches delivered by William and Kate were excellent and while I have always thought William to be a good speaker and improving daily, Kate did exceptionally well. Too bad the words got lost in the din of the media noise.
DeleteIt’s interesting you phrase it as a side show. That may be how it’s being perceived to royals and royalists but to the citizens of these nations this tour was their chance to have the worlds attention and make their views known. I don’t think they’d perceive all that occurred as a “side show” the fact that the royals seem to be caught flat footed by that is their own issue. They should not be expecting deference and willingness to go along with the way these tours have gone for 70 years, and if they are then they are the problematic party here.
DeleteI think this look is quite polarising…I want to like it…but I can’t lol
ReplyDeleteA big thank you to you, Charlotte, for sacrificing sleep & for all the fantastic posts!
An absolute no go for me!
ReplyDeleteConflicted
ReplyDeleteThe puff sleeves, the ruffle at the neckline and THAT BOW are strong reminders of Princess Diana’s wedding dress. The whole outfit looks outdated as coming directly from the 1980s with the colours, the print, the pearls, the peplum and the white pumps. Sorry to say but this outfit is a rare miss to me in Duchess 's wardrobe. In the 1980s it would have been super chic. Now it looks dowdy and old-fashioned.
ReplyDeleteFantastic photos and so glad to have this blog to use to keep updated with the tour. loved it all! Thank you!
ReplyDeleteThat is… not good. It’s not 1980s inspired it’s just 1980s. The worst parts of it.
ReplyDeleteIt was a royal tour like no others and require the royals to rethink the way they plan and present themselves in future overseas tours.
ReplyDeleteFashion wise, it did delivered. Like Charlotte, my fav is the ice blue gown. The least fav is the 1980's farewell dress which is full of cumbersome and fussy details.
Thank you for your brilliant coverage of this tour! I so enjoyed reading your posts hour-by-hour, and day-after-day.
ReplyDeleteThank you so very much for your excellent coverage of this tour, Charlotte! I thoroughly enjoyed each stop! They always look so relaxed and happy, completely perfect for their position. Totally agree, I am just in love with the Phillipa Lepley gown.
ReplyDeleteI don't like leaving negative comments, especially when this tour had challenging moments. But, I'm going to keep my criticism to the light and breezy - why does she dress like this? I absolutely adored some of her tour looks this time, but it was about 20/80 like/dislike. I just don't understand her style anymore. That makes me so sad. I want to cheer and shout and yippee when it comes to Kate, but I can't. :(
ReplyDeleteWe are all entitled to voice our opinions but frankly getting upset over Catherine's choice of outfits is a waste of energy. I have been interested to learn more about the Caribbean and the asperations of the people Thanks so much Charlotte for your informative introductions.
Deletei thought everything she wore on this tour was beautiful. Except for this last dress.
ReplyDeleteSometimes, comments suggest her outfits are dowdy, and I never see that because she’s so lovely, she can pull off dresses that other women cannot and still look refreshing and youthful. High neck, pussybows, endless ruffles, tiers, below-the-knee lengths, etc. don’t really appeal to my eye, but she can still look amazing in them. This dress I just don’t understand. On her, on anyone. It absolutely reminds me of something my dear great aunt would wear in the 1980’s, when she was in her late 80’s. And perhaps this mustardy yellow is the one color that doesn’t look good on Kate. When I think about on this tour, I’m going to pretend I didn’t see this dress.
They must be exhausted. Jet lag, very long and full days, lots of travelling, gala dinners. It seems they had one evening to themselves the second day, I hope they managed to get some sleep. As for diving with guide and photographer to highlight the marine world, I wouldn't call that private time. And I don't know how they managed to do some snorkeling on their own? Their schedule has been packed, they never were alone and they had to change clothes in the plane. Add to that the mentally exhausting politics...I think they did a stellar job. And of course, Kate's wardrobe was amazing. A feast for the eyes. That last evening gown!
ReplyDeleteWell said! I imagine they are enjoying many hugs and cuddles with their children.
DeleteNatacha, I agree. A job well done!
Deleteoh, my. That dress is a BIG miss hopefully not to be repeated.
ReplyDeleteThis yellow 80's inspired look is one of my least favorite looks on her, ever.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely love it!
ReplyDeleteI also love it. The silhouette works so well on Catherine and the fabric pattern has a Caribbean vibe. Of course it's 80s influenced, quite Diana-esque in fact but 70s and 80s looks are back again and all over 2022 runways, which some will perhaps dislike.
DeleteOh, dear.
ReplyDeleteI've seen some Alessandra Rich items I like very much (her tweed pieces appeal to me), but this is not among them. It's beautifully fitted, as are all the Duchess's clothes, but it's too busy, with far too much going on between the print, the peplum, the belt, and so forth. And I just dislike the design in general. The slim midi skirt silhouette is elegant, but why is the Duchess displaying such a penchant for puffed sleeves these days? If you ask me, they shouldn't be worn by anyone over the age of 6.
In 1981, the Princess Royal wore a busy yellow and white ensemble to the wedding of Prince Charles and Diana Spencer. The French fashion press said it made her look like an "omelette norvégienne," which is a type of dessert made with ice cream. I think the label might well belong on this dress. On the other hand, having lived through 80s fashion, I'm trying to see what's especially "80s" about this outfit and having a hard time doing so. Maybe the peplum? They were popular then. They did show up on a lot of suits and dresses. I still have and wear, as vintage items, some of my 80s pieces. They are mostly characterized by their very strong shoulders.
I won't make any further political remarks. I've made quite enough as it is.
Thank you Charlotte for your amazing coverage this week. I imagine you might be as tired as William and Kate, albeit without worrying about a bunch of strangers commenting on what you wrote last week. :)
ReplyDeleteI thought this tour really represented the Good and the Bed of the BRF.
First, the Good: A lovely couple, fully engaged when meeting the people, exploring the sights and hearing about the challenges facing their region. Even though walkabouts were limited, one could tell that people who met W&K were delighted by their encounters. On top of that, we got to see a beautiful Princess, in stunning clothes and jewels, in a variety of settings, seemingly happily and thoroughly enjoying representing the Queen. In that sense, a perfect tour.
But, the Bad really shone through and it has nothing to do w W&K and how they handled themselves this week. To me, the Tour really shined a light on how bizarre it is for a country to have a Head of State who has no ties to that country, with the exception of her family’s historical role as a colonizer of that country. I don’t confess to understand what benefits accrue to countries who have opted to keep the Queen as their Head of State or to the Royal Family for having the countries in their realm. On the former, it seems largely ceremonial. On the latter, maybe just a matter of pride? To me, the Passing Out ceremony in Jamaica really summed it up. Seeing W&K as spectators in the viewing stands looked completely normal: honored guests having the opportunity to view a ceremony being put on by their host country. But watching them in that open air vehicle, lording over their troops, was uncomfortable to watch. A throwback to something we saw HM and the DoE do decades ago, but not in a good way. My impression was that W&K didn’t look like they belonged IN this ceremony, partaking in it, but yet there they were, inserted into an important ceremony for which they should take no credit. To their credit, W&K looked uncomfortable too. I think that image is going to be an important one to unfolding history of the end of much of the Commonwealth’s official ties to Britain. I hope and expect that HM’s heirs will embrace the changed landscape.
Meanwhile, enjoy your rest Charlotte. A job well done! Bravo to you!
I think you hit the nail on the head with the open-car vehicle parade. W&K themselves looked uncomfortable, so you have to question the judgment of whoever signed off on it and thought it would be a good idea.
DeleteBeen watching Kate for many years now and she's consistent: she looks more comfortable and happy in the casual engagements (like the fishing one) than in these pomp and circumstance parades. Yet this tour had several of these pomp and circumstance ceremonies. Why?
Ivy Lin, I agree that W&K seem to prefer the more informal events, but the way I understand it, tours like the ones in India and Pakistan are mostly arranged by the High Commissionar and the KP team, while tours where they are there are the royal family of the country, gets arrange by the government of the country. So they have a lot less say in the types of engagements.
DeleteThey were there as the royal representatives celebrating HM being the head of state for 75 years. Hence a lot more formal, pomp and circumstance events. The type of things the HoS would normally take part in.
My guess is the next time they visit these countries it will no longer be as representative of the HoS and everyone will be happier.
I’m sorry to say this may be my least favorite look on her ever.
ReplyDeleteI have to say, I hate this dress. One of my least favorite dresses the duchess has ever worn.
ReplyDeleteI loved her tour wardrobe! My favorite of the tour is the green gown worn in Jamaica. My least favorite was her farewell dress. I swear I had that same dress in 1988. I might have liked it better in a plain color. There was a lot going on between the print and all the details. I hope the middle part and straight hair is a passing trend.
ReplyDeleteA picture of Catherine and the kids for Mother’s Day would be icing on the cake.
Hope from USA
Thank you Charlotte! My favorites were the yellow Roksana, the pink Vampire’s Wife and the last day pink dress with those awesome sunglasses. I loved her updo hair with the green Packham dress.
ReplyDeleteYou’ve said it all! I’m sure they’ll take time to do some important and necessary reflection and honestly I’d love the Royal Rota and those who report on royals to reflect as well. I felt some just amplify the negativity and have not learned much over the past few years! I’m all for constructive criticism, I think some go a bit beyond that. Sue
The most memorable event was William’s speech and some of its content. I had not kept up to know the progression of his speech since I had not followed the couple for a while. (Well, Covid sort shut the world for a while – no memorable speech).
ReplyDeleteHis speech delivery, style, and manner is on a much higher level now. It almost reminded me of Charles Spencer’s style of speech and delivery.
Even as much, or more memorable was his remark regarding “independence”. That very quote may draw people into his speech for a long time, and more people will listen to it.
“And with Jamaica celebrating 60 years of independence this year, and Belize celebrating 40 years of independence last year, I want to say this: We support with pride and respect your decisions about your future. Relationships evolve. Friendship endures."
Kate’s departure dress from the waist up is more of a reminder of Diana’s 80s dress (IMO). The emerald green is most favorite.
I think she looked beautiful throughout the tour, but I was surprised to see she hadn’t highlighted local designers more with her outfits. Historically she has been stronger at creating fashion bridges with the designers in the host country. Perhaps because of the pandemic?
ReplyDeleteMy goodness: Such nitpicking on here. I think she looks stunning all of the time and I can only dream of being so elegant.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with you, there never used to be
DeleteAgree!! Times and people have changed. It seems like everyone is an authority on diplomacy and politics. We come to this blog for fashion and to give our views on that. We may not agree, but it's good to read the opinions.
DeleteAgree..times have changed. This used to be the place for Kate's fans to enjoy watching her fashion, now it's a place for negative nonsense and diplomacy. I recognize many of the bloggers and enjoy reading their comments.
DeleteOverall, I agree. I wasn't a fan of this one in particular, but all the posts seem to have these types of comments, unfortunately.
DeleteI agree that the icy blue gown was a triumph, although second for me is the colorful sundress.
ReplyDeleteRegarding optics, I echo what zipzipzippy said. And for me, the image of very tall and white king-to-be reviewing all black troops just shocked me. Why would a nation want a queen/king at all, especially one from another country? The fact that the issues that arose were not foreseen is shocking to me -- the powers that be in the UK are very out of touch with the world, and that's not OK. I say this with no sense of superiority in my country -- the US is still a very, very problematic place. Like the UK, abolishment of slavery did not fix things at all. It was probably a bad time to have a tour -- W&K are of course going to want to celebrate their beloved family member but it's hard to celebrate a continued monarchy as opposed to a democracy. I believe that Commonwealth nations gain military benefits and tourism benefits but at what cost? It feels like they have to sell their soul.
I never really understood the reason for the tour. I think that if the stated purpose had been to visit with an aim to highlight the islands' assets with a focus on tourism and something else -- perhaps some costly investments by the UK in industries that would help their independence -- there would have bee less criticism. The fact that William changed his tone at the end of the tour says that it took that long for his speechwriters to get it. In the US and UK, as elsewhere so much wealth was generated at the expense of enslaved people. In the US, in 1838, the Jesuits who ran Georgetown University sold 272 enslaved people to pay off the university's debts. They are now apologizing and seeking to distribute $100 million to the descendants. A prime plot of ocean-front property was taken from a black couple in the early 1900s in California and just now deeded back to the heirs. This is greatly the exception, and even with this, families were stripped of the ability to acquire generational wealth. Families and institutions do not deserve accumulated wealth that they received at the expense of others, but few are willing to give up what they have.
Maybe this will be a valuable learning experience. W&K seem to be very liked wherever they go -- they are friendly and engaging. Perhaps by the time William is king, the position will be fully one of ceremony. Colonialism, which was practiced by SO many nations, was a terrible thing.
I don't know how you did it, Charlotte, with the time difference, but thank you for covering all aspects: fashion, political, environmental, cultural. The exciting fashion aspect was that Kate's outfits were so varied -- and even the disliked ones broke up the usual sameness.
I agree completely. The optics of white royals visiting countries where the majority of people are POC at this particular time in history were just not good and I think the powers that be in charge of this tour really failed William and Kate in the planning of it.
DeleteWho will defend these small counties against aggressors? Being part of the commonwealth has given them protection under Britain's military. Does anyone know?
DeleteSorry to say this Allison, but your comments are very insulting to anyone who lives in a country with a constitutional monarchy. It is not only a few Commonwealth countries which have chosen to keep their kings and queens. Norway, Sweden, Denmark and the Netherlands are amongst the most respected democracies in the world and all of them are constitutional monarchies. I consider my country Aotearoa/ New Zealand to be at least as democratic as yours. I think I would be speaking for millions of people throughout the Commonwealth of all political persuasions in saying that we don't feel that we have "sold our souls." We regard the Commonwealth of Nations as a fellowship of equals not as a colonial entity.
DeleteI totally agree with your comments. Australia is part of the Commonwealth and like New Zealand I would also say we don’t think of ourselves as being a colonial entity. You can’t erase history you need to learn from it. I believe C&W are doing exactly that. The tour offered friendship nothing more
DeleteDd
Kate does great at bringing back nostalgia for past royal tours with her farewell outfit. I have to say that my favorite outfit of the tour was the green gown in Jamaica. It was the perfect princess look. thanks
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the day William and Kate are Good Will Ambassadors, not Career Diplomats.
ReplyDeleteThey represent the Crown as such following the script they are handed. They simply show up!
I think the departure dress is playful, girly and very cute.
ReplyDeleteYou may all despise this dress but it’s absolutely fashionable right now. So no, it’s not a nod to Diana. It’s so boring that her clothes are always compared to hers. Fashion is cyclical, she’s wearing it because she likes it.
ReplyDeleteShe looks great in anything, even in this outfit, but this yellow 1980s dress needs to stay in the 1980s! Not a fan. Everything else she wore was just so gorgeous though!
ReplyDeleteI think she must have lost a bet; that's surely the only way somebody would choose to wear this! Hilariously bad. But I liked most of her outfits and it was great to follow a tour again even if this one did have its difficult moments. Thank you for all your work posting all the details, Charlotte.
ReplyDeleteYour comment made me laugh😂😂
DeleteHi Charlotte,
ReplyDeleteIt had been a long time. I hope all is well with you.
----
To be specific, Kate's departure dress from the waist up is a reminder of Diana's wedding dress from the early 80s.
I try not be overly negative, but this has to be the worst thing she has ever worn. It's dated, not retro and absolutely cringe, does her 0 favors. I hope we never see this dress again.
ReplyDeleteThis outfit has a lot of extra elements. Its not appealing to me, but the Duchess looks fabulous. She has looked both elegant and beautiful the entire trip. Well done to her.
ReplyDeleteAll of her outfits had been nice. The last one I can't warm up to, the big sleeves ruffles and a bow is a bit much for me. But I am not the one wearing it it is Kate and she looked OK in it. The children must be happy, to see their parents back home again. I feel they have done a very good job, with what they had to deal with.
ReplyDeleteThank you Charlotte for stellar coverage. I suspect that after the Jubilee tours this year there will be very very few if any tours in the future and certainly none of this length. My view is that causes/ projects like the earth shot prize will be the focus of the younger Royals. The tour that was intended as a swan song for HM has been ruthlessly exploited by very very many people to further their owm ends. Because of this publicity for important projects like the fantastic work on the reef was lost in the hijacking. So let us enjoy this as it may well be our last.
ReplyDeleteOn another note why do we feel the need to tear a woman to shreds day after day as though we are the ultimate arbitrators of everything and why do we comment in ignorance again as ultimate arbitrators. So many of the comments on HM position in these countries and the commonwealth in general showed this.
Again thank you Charlotte I do enjoy your blog.
Libby this is a lovely and well-thought-out comment. I won’t reiterate it because it’s all I’d say.
DeleteLibby no one is tearing Kate to shreds. This is a fan blog. We discuss Kate's fashions selections for fun and debate the future of the royal family as people who actually care about its survival. We all love Kate and William and wish them the very best. Discussing fashion choices is just a bit of harmless fun. No one is being nasty here.
DeleteBeth in SF
I agree Libby. A pity because objectively it has been a great tour. They did very well. On the other hand, it is a good learning experience for William.
DeleteThe Queen had her lot of negative reactions, and republicanism will always be there, like political disinformation. Perhaps he should have an older seasoned diplomat in his team.
Natacha you speak of republicanism as if it were bad. I think a nation deciding its own rulers is a good thing.
DeleteI could be wrong but I don't think anyone is criticizing Kate. I have not seen her disrespect anyone in all the years of event/tour watching. Even though she has a particular lifestyle, I do not believe her to not welcome people from all backgrounds. I think, in general, all her fashions were appreciated and welcomed from the tour. The people I have a problem with are those who set up the tours -- perhaps the same people Diana didn't like. I can't imagine how hard it must be to have her job but Kate seems to be a very kind person. If there is anything ugly, it is based on untrue press, in my opinion.
DeleteIvy lin, republicanism is not bad per se, but if you are a RF, your fiercest detractors/ critics are those who wish for a Republic.Only logical that they will have to face those kind of critics all their life.
DeleteAnd you speak as if a monarchy was a bad thing. Countries that are monarchies get to choose their leaders too. With the added advantage their head of state isn't partisan and represents all of the citizens, not just his party.
Interestingly, the Caribbean countries that have the Queen as an head of state made the deliberate choice to keep her when other former colonies didn't. They felt is was a guarantee against dictatorship or a military coup.
I haven't said anything about the yellow dress because I can't decide. I start to not like it but then think I would have loved to wear it!
ReplyDeleteI wanted to mention, if it's OK, a wonderful rescuer in Nassau -- The Voiceless Dogs of Nassau, Bahamas. During the hurricane a few years ago, she took all her dogs inside her little house -- all 97! They were very well behaved and she showed a video. That luckily got her some attention, and now she takes in hundreds a year. Many of them die despite vet care, but she sends about 200 a years on flights to the US, where they find hones. She is a truly amazing person -- she's also online as Chella Phillips.
The model for a successful/relevant tour was available in Meghan and Harry’s 2019 South Africa tour. The argument/rationale for more diversity within the ranks is clear.
ReplyDeleteWas it successful/ relevant? I don't exactly remember what they did except give an interview at the end saying it had been to much for them. Also Harry recreating his mother's picture in a minefield and the meeting with Desmond Tutu. And a polemic because South Africans were furious to be portrayed as a poor country. I am not sure it was a model tour, although it worked at the time. In fact, the problem with this Caribbean tour is that it followed a model which had been successful previously.
DeleteOh my, this dress is probably the worst ever in my taste. It may be in fashion right now, but only those who don’t remember the 80s can miss that fashion, in my opinion!
ReplyDeleteThe colour, the puffed sleeves, the bow, the ruffles ... ugh!
Loved all the other outfits, especially the flowy summer dresses and the ice-blue gown.
Thanks for the great coverage Charlotte!
This dress reminds me of clothing bought on a trip that fits the time and place...but when you get home it feels incongruous and one wonders "what was I thinking?" It happened to me when I bought a cowgirl dress in Nashville. And again beachy dresses in Jamaica and Barbados very much like this one. Were there not all the political controversy, this dress would have fit in, in Jamaica or the Bahamas. But in the current state of affairs, it would have smacked of appropriation. Wise then to leave it as the departure dress.
ReplyDeleteWhen this tour began, I remember comments about the importance of tourism and the hope tourists would return as we emerge from the pandemic. I've enjoyed reading about earlier royal tours and added some places to my travel bucket list. The countries on this tour? No. It feels as if the tour was hijacked by politics and may not reap the economic benefits it seemed many businesses were hoping for.
ReplyDeleteI agree . A pity because one of the aims of the tour was to booster tourism after covid. Too bad WK had to go to Jamaica, everything else was lost in the polemic. Which is unfair to Belize and the Bahamas who welcomed them and were happy to see their beauties highlighted after 2 very difficult years.
DeleteI think the only ones hijacking the tour for their own agenda were the PM of Jamaica and some members of the press. Everyone else seemed happy to have the Cambridges visit and celebrate the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee.
DeleteIf I ever travel to the Caribbean I would love to visit Belize or the Bahamas.
If you check the local press the coverage is extremely positive. And on tv dozens of people that saw them and even met them talked about how nice they were.
DeleteDirecting this to zipzipzipply, Ivy Lin, BEKKIGE BINNEGOED, Allison in US, and quite a few others:
ReplyDeleteIt was the Jamaican's who held onto that Land Rover, all these many years and requested that W&K duplicate the ride in the back, as done by the Queen and Prince Philip. They were trying to recreate a memory, not recreate colonialism. The photo of W&K shaking hands through a wire fence, was accompanied by a similar photo of Raheem Sterling, a black football player, also shaking hands through that fence. The fence was a security measure put in place years ago to keep people off the football field. Nobody was being incarcerated.
Belize has had its independence from Britain for 40 years; Jamaica for 60 years, Bahamas for 50 years. It is a long time since they were British colonies. If they become republics, without the Queen as head of state, so be it! Currently 34 or the 54 countries in the Commonwealth are republics; 15 have the Queen as head of state; five have their own monarchies, not the British monarch. Membership in the Commonwealth is VOLUNTARY and no country is forced to join or stay. Some countries in the Commonwealth were NEVER under British rule.
Respectfully, I wish people from other nations, would butt out of the affairs of the British, the Commonwealth and any long ago colonies. Let countries speak for themselves. Do know, that although the PM of Jamaica Is a republican and wants to drop the Queen as the head of state, the decision will still go to a vote. He does not have the last word. Nobody is oppressed here. I am Canadian, we are not a republic, we are a strong democracy. We gained our independence from Britain in 1867...yet we STILL retain the Queen as our head of state. The implication that developing countries are under "the thumb" of the British, is offensive. I am disappointed that this blog, with its wonderful reporting about Kate's activities, causes and fashion, so often becomes a forum in the comments, to attack the British Royal Family.
While you are not under the thumb of the British, I argue that the people who lived in the area of Canada before the French and British have not fared so well. And I read of continued mistreatments.
DeleteBeing criticized is not being attacked. The royals are not above criticism. Period. I’m disappointed at this blind willfulness to ignore the legitimate issues around the institution and role of royalty. And frankly I don’t think you have any place lecturing on how majority black and poorer commonwealth counties should feel from your secure perch in Canada. It is widely known that not all commonwealth countries are treated equally. Do you think perhaps a majority black nation such as Jamaica with a profound tragic history of slavery that was carried out in the name of the British crown might feel differently about this than Canada? Maybe ponder your own words and “attacks”
DeleteThank you Anon!
DeleteWell said I totally agree. So many people have no concept of the Commonwealth but they seem to think they are experts on the subject no offence intended but it seems to be mainly Americans. I actually stopped looking on this website for a while because I found some of the comments published were starting to be very critical. I also hate the way Catherine's dress sense is pulled apart every time she attends an engagement. Can't we just appreciate her for what she does, not what she wears.
DeleteThis is a fashion site. We are here to discuss Kate's fashions not adore everything she wears.
DeleteAnonymous at 22:07 I would be interested to learn which Commonwealth countries are not treated equally and who is responsible for discriminating against them? Please give us concrete examples of this serious accusation. I am sure it is not the Commonwealth Secretariat as they select their staff from all of the constituent countries. Neither the present Queen or the British Government has any say in the programmes run by the Commonwealth Foundation so where is this happening?
DeleteThanks for all your hard work, photos, history etc. over eight days. It’s been lovely to Will and Kate on tour with dignity and grace.
ReplyDeleteI love the look. Yes definitely very 80ts vibe but it looks good and The Duchess looked beautiful. That suit is just wrong on William. It looks like he borrowed a suit that doesn't even fit him. A slim fit suit would look very good on him. They have been working hard on this tour. So I say well done and good job. Thanks Charlotte. S. ☺
ReplyDeleteThank you Allison in US27 March 2022 at 16:10 for giving us some examples of reparation done in USA.
ReplyDeleteI was entirely ignorant of British active involvement in the slave trade until it surfaced out in the Royal Caribbean tour. Having done some readings on the subject, it would be remiss on my part if I do not share this article here.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/12/british-history-slavery-buried-scale-revealed
Noor, the history of the world is abominable. People have always been used to benefit others. I have been learning about the horrible conditions/laws for POC in the US after they were freed! It's called Jim Crow and it was brutal. What gets me about these islands is that the original occupants are eliminated and then enslaved people are used for wealth. When the enslaved people are "freed," their "owners" get reparations! The US owes reparations to Native Americans, Hawaiians, POC, Japanese Americans, POC who had their towns destroyed or were used in scientific experiments, but so little is done. On a more insidious level, when a family that is not white is denied home ownership, they are denied the one source of generational security and wealth that white families enjoy. People are so cruel to each other -- W&K are not cruel, so they need smarter PR people to avoid putting them in these bad situations. I completely blame their PR people.
DeleteWell, we have to remember that slaves arrived in the Americas in the first place because Europeans took them there. That's certainly how slavery was established in the future United States. We tend not to associate Europe with slavery because there were relatively few slaves on European soil, though some certainly lived there. Slavery was attractive because Europeans needed cheap labor for their overseas plantations in the islands and in mainland North and South America, not because they needed it at home.
DeleteIt was the Portuguese who really initiated European involvement in the African trade in the late 15th century, at the beginning of the early-modern era. Prior to that time, most of the slaves (and of course serfs) in Europe were white people, but the Catholic Church had long inveighed against the enslavement of Christians by fellow Christians. Non-Christian Africans seemed to represent a goldmine to Europeans newly claiming rich overseas territories.
It is a disaster...hope never ever see it again...
ReplyDeleteI love her, her style, elegance and modesty....but this costume should never leave the wardrobe...
After reading many comments over this tour I’m sorry but I find it uncomfortable with women harshly pulling apart another women. It’s sad. There is enough bad in this world so why can’t people be nice.
ReplyDeleteDd
I commend her on this outfit choice. If anyone can pull it off, it would be her. She looks lovely! ❤️
ReplyDeleteA heart touching visit of Duke and Duchess.
ReplyDeleteWell...I can say that the dress itself i fo not like but I find it looks lovely on her bevause it gives her some volume. I think this must be a very difficult choice for most women..I like it and appreciate the fact that she takes some risk and wears something different. I did not like her style so much during the tour...this dress, surprisingly,must be my favourite. Aldo she seens more relaxed...
ReplyDeleteI have to add something...you may condider it stupid...I think in this tour she has really exagerated the use of colour similarities with the flags of the countries. Honestly...I understand it but just to a certain level. This time, she has continously used it...and when she went out of the plane with that tourquoise dress arriving to bahamas I just found it too much...even irritating..
ReplyDeleteAlso as a very tiny person I think she never thinks about the hight of the people they meet. she is already very tall and she uses 10/12 cm heels...honestly...it is somewhat unconfortable for tiny people to speak with very tall people but she does not seem to pay attention to that. So you see...it must seem nonsense to many of you..but for me...paying attention to details is not only about the colours of the country but also to this kind of little things..making the others feel confortable...
I agree completely. Wearing those wedges when meeting the cocoa farmers and then to dance was unnecessary. And I just can’t believe she didn’t wear any local designers (clothes, not jewelry).
DeleteVery pretty. HRH experiments and thats what is so attractive. Good for her.
ReplyDeleteAnother Canadian here. Canada, like Australia, has apologized directly to its indigenous people for the destruction of their culture, the taking of their children and the mistreatments of the people. Canada started to move forward with reparations by setting aside C$40 billion in 2022 for the taking of indigenous children from their families.
ReplyDeleteCanada is a diverse country and the younger generations today don’t associate themselves with Britain or the royal family. The news about the royal family inhabits the space in the check out lane where People magazines are sold or ET Canada. This isn’t about disrespecting the crown, but that the crown isn’t an integral identity for many Canadians. It’s an expensive and convoluted process to seek a divorce to become a republic because of the way our Constitution is written. The government has bigger problems to deal with these days so royalists don’t need to fear the immediate future.
Once the Queen dies and Charles becomes king, the cost and work to change out money, names, oaths, etc. will need to reflect the diversity and modernity of 21st century Canada. Charles seems like the kind of person who may be more at ease with a less formal set up with less king and subjects role playing.
-Snaw-naw-as
This is one of her most elegant and beautiful looks. With her hair pulled back, her gorgeous face, and bone structure is revealed. Every inch a Queen.
ReplyDeleteI just went through all of the photos again and while there were many lovely fashions, I can't stop looking at the ice blue gown. It's stunning!
ReplyDelete